Sample Report - Example Only
Wartegg Drawing Completion Test
This example shows the structure and evidence limits of a complete InnerCanvas report. It is not an assessment of the viewer.
Observation before interpretation
What is visibly present
- All eight fields are completed on the same board.
- Several stimuli are integrated into larger forms rather than left isolated.
- Curved motifs recur in three fields while line density varies across the set.
Possible reflections
- Completion style and stimulus integration provide a structured way to compare visual choices across fields.
- The literature does not justify treating any single motif as a fixed personality sign.
Questions worth exploring
- Which field felt most open-ended?
- Where did the original mark most shape your response?
- Which completion feels least expected to you?
Research and methodology
Evidence strength: limited and context-dependent
Limitations
- Wartegg studies use heterogeneous scoring systems.
- Reported reliability does not validate individual symbol meanings.
- Research traditions have not produced a uniform cumulative interpretation system.